Admission and psychological safety
Working with horses, trauma and high-masking neurodivergent coachees calls for a high standard of psychological safety. Many neurodivergent people, and certainly the high-masking group, have spent a lifetime experiencing that their boundaries were missed or that their way of being was reduced to a deficit. In this training we prepare professionals who do not repeat that experience. That means: working from congruence, respecting difference without romanticising it, reading behaviour as information rather than deviation, and taking responsibility for your own influence in the field.
We distance ourselves from the deficit model and from assumptions such as “we're all a bit autistic really”. Different neurocognitive profiles process information, stimuli, language and contact in fundamentally different ways. That is the starting point, not a footnote.
A training that carries what it asks
This training is delivered within what my own nervous system can carry. That is not a limitation, it is methodological. A training about congruence, regulation and boundaries cannot be led by a trainer who stretches her own boundaries to accommodate everyone. What I ask of participants, I ask of myself as well.
In concrete terms: a maximum of eight participants per cohort, clear agreements about when and how we are in contact, and fixed structures for substantive questions and peer supervision. Anyone looking for a trainer who is always available is in the wrong place. Anyone looking for a trainer who does what she teaches is in the right one.
Admission
Every candidate starts with a personal intake conversation. That is not an exam but a mutual calibration: does the training fit your background and your role, do you have enough of a basis to integrate the methodology, and can you work within the framework the training offers? We look together, and no is a valid answer for both of us.
We ask three things of participants.
Capacity for reflection. You are willing to examine your own reactions, assumptions and influence without automatically laying them at the door of the client, the horse or the group. Horses respond to small shifts in tension and direction; high-masking coachees register those too. You are part of the field.
Respect for the framework. Safety arises through clarity. Agreements, channels and the division of roles within the training exist to protect everyone, you included. The practical and administrative arrangements are discussed in the intake and set down before the start.
Willingness to unlearn. Working with this group asks not only for new knowledge, but also for letting go of coaching reflexes that do not fit: interpreting less quickly, helping less quickly, letting silence stand, not placing the body beneath language. We do not ask for perfection, but for professional willingness.